Image: Peter Macdiarmid/Getty
that the ruling is bad for women, and certainly France has now joined an undesirable club counting such states as Iran and Saudi Arabia, which believe they should regulate how women dress.
A 24-year-old French woman of Pakistani origin had brought the case before the European Court of Human Rights in Strasbourg, arguing that the original 2011 French ban on face-covering veils, intended to protect her against oppression, instead violated her rights to freedom of religion, expression and assembly, and was discriminatory.
Dear France, please don't fight this fight in my name. I don't wear a face-covering veil, but I think I should have the right to do so if I wanted — especially in supposedly freedom-loving France, the country that gave us Voltaire.
The chief result of this ban will simply be that women who wear the veil will have fewer freedoms because they will be forced to stay at home. Those who choose to violate the law will incur a fine of about $200 or lessons in French citizenship.
The ban is also likely to further stigmatize Muslim women — some of whom do choose to wear the veil. “The argument that the law protects women has no foundation,” said Geneviève Garrigos, president of Amnesty International France, according to France24. “Many [Muslim] women wear veils of their own free will," she said, adding: “The state does not exist to tell people how they should dress. Rather, it should allow them to make their own choices.” (Amnesty International supported the appeal by the woman who brought the case before the European Court of Human Rights.)The ban is also likely to further stigmatize Muslim women — some of whom do choose to wear the veil.
France, which has one of the largest Muslim populations in Europe (estimated at up to 6 million people) was the first European country to ban face-covering veils in public. But others have since followed. (The BBC has a good breakdown here.)
The judgment cannot be appealed since it was handed down by the Grand Chamber of the European Court.
So much for Liberté, Égalité and Fraternité.
946
Ads by Google
Need A Current Account? - Get Any UBA Current Account Online. Simple and Convenient, Apply Now! www.ubagroup.com/Online_CurrentAcc
Need A Current Account? - Get Any UBA Current Account Online. Simple and Convenient, Apply Now! www.ubagroup.com/Online_CurrentAcc
Image: Peter Macdiarmid/Getty Images
A 24-year-old French woman of Pakistani origin had brought the case before the European Court of Human Rights in Strasbourg, arguing that the original 2011 French ban on face-covering veils, intended to protect her against oppression, instead violated her rights to freedom of religion, expression and assembly, and was discriminatory.
Dear France, please don't fight this fight in my name. I don't wear a face-covering veil, but I think I should have the right to do so if I wanted — especially in supposedly freedom-loving France, the country that gave us Voltaire.
The chief result of this ban will simply be that women who wear the veil will have fewer freedoms because they will be forced to stay at home. Those who choose to violate the law will incur a fine of about $200 or lessons in French citizenship.
The ban is also likely to further stigmatize Muslim women — some of whom do choose to wear the veil. “The argument that the law protects women has no foundation,” said Geneviève Garrigos, president of Amnesty International France, according to France24. “Many [Muslim] women wear veils of their own free will," she said, adding: “The state does not exist to tell people how they should dress. Rather, it should allow them to make their own choices.” (Amnesty International supported the appeal by the woman who brought the case before the European Court of Human Rights.)The ban is also likely to further stigmatize Muslim women — some of whom do choose to wear the veil.
France, which has one of the largest Muslim populations in Europe (estimated at up to 6 million people) was the first European country to ban face-covering veils in public. But others have since followed. (The BBC has a good breakdown here.)
The judgment cannot be appealed since it was handed down by the Grand Chamber of the European Court.
So much for Liberté, Égalité and Fraternité.


No comments:
Post a Comment